So, I guess, I wonder -- with the deficiencies indicated above -- what operational use such a list would really have in the end. ;-) Other than yet another interesting metric of just how bad things are out there(TM).
And, I should say, that in the end.. The best use might be aggregate statistical trending etc, without publicly (or privately) identifying specific nodes. That might actually be very interesting, just like we have clueful folks tracking a bunch of metrics for, say, the routing system itself. Perhaps folks like CAIDA might be interested in this.. ;-) Just a thought.. Thanks, Christian -- You may safely ignore any of the junk below. If you're reading this, you are the intended addressee. Proprietary info.. On NANOG? You're kidding right? ***** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 162