9 Feb
2009
9 Feb
'09
9:24 p.m.
John Peach wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:16:49 -0500 "TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com> wrote:
The SOX auditor ought to know better. Any auditor that requires NAT is incompenent. Sadly, there are many audit REQUIREMENTS explicitly naming NAT and RFC1918 addressing ...
SOX auditors are incompetent. I've been asked about anti-virus software on UNIX servers and then asked to prove that they run UNIX.........
Not just SOX. I vaguely remember something in PCI about NAT. It wouldn't surprise me if every auditing thing involving computers said something about requiring NAT. See my earlier comment about NAT=firewall. ~Seth