RE: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported)

The comment looks outdated: Who cares now about ATM? But all wireless (including WiFi) emulate broadcast in a very unsatisfactory way. Hence, the requirement is still very accurate. -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+vasilenko.eduard=huawei.com@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Masataka Ohta Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 7:32 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported) Randy Bush wrote:

three of the promises of ipng which ipv6 did not deliver o compatibility/transition, o security, and o routing & renumbering

You miss a promise of o ND over ATM/NBMA which caused IPv6 lack a notion of link broadcast. Masataka Ohta