28 Sep
2007
28 Sep
'07
12:26 a.m.
Randy,
with all due respect, jari; maybe the number of groups is neither the problem nor the solution
too much energy has been and is still being wasted dealing with overly cute/complex ideas these wgs invent to fancy up ipv6 so it will be deployed; from tla/nla/... to ula to sham6. this has prevented focusing on the real problems of deployment so they can be solved.
I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying to do something about nat-pt. What else would you see as a priority? Jari