On 2/10/2010 7:55 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 3:55 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Jake Khuon wrote:
Excellent production.
I'll go with that.
... but still an advertisement for use of IXPs instead of private peering or alike. I'd say it contains several factual errors or at least omittance of important factors (settlement free peering in other ways than IXPs, for instance, is hardly mentioned).
Could you point to a single factual error please? That is a serious charge to just throw out without a single word to back up your claim.
And no, "omittance of important factors" is not a "factual error" in a 5 minute video of a wide and amazingly complex topic.
Put another way: If you think you can do better, then let's see your video.
That is definitely the best answer--if you don't like it, do one (at your expense of time and other resources) that you like better. I think I am probably a member of the target audience, and I though it was great (and recommended it to other folk). Amazing how many people there are that can't do it, but can find fault with those that can and do. -- "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml