Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:41:50AM -0700, Tony Hain wrote:

While it is often great sport to poke at MS, did you consider that this might have nothing to do with classfullness or CIDR? I believe you will find that 0 & -1 are invalid for whatever netmask the windows stack is given. You

So you're saying that with 10.200.200.0/22, that 10.200.201.0, 10.200.202.0 and 10.200.203.0 are invalid host addresses? Setting up DHCP scopes for this space must be painful. Not to mention use of /32 addressing for loopbacks. I could almost forgive not handling /31 given that RFC3021 was onlyu published in 12/2000. Bob