18 Feb
2015
18 Feb
'15
6:44 p.m.
For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates. Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included ethernet. -Pete On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus and thus limited to USB speeds.
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole <mcole.mailinglists@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015 4:30 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog@nanog.org >> 'NANOG list'" <nanog@nanog.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices. </div><div> </div>