The upstreams should certainly be filtering this. I am truly surprised someone is still leaking a ten/8 network to the world. Alex On Sat, 14 Mar 1998 jlixfeld@idirect.ca wrote:
No, you should definetly not be able to ping it. Where are you in respect to home.net? If you are not directly connected to home.net and if you can ping that IP, then @home is trying to advertise 10.0.184.0 to their upstreams and they are accepting those advertisments. If you are on home.net then you will be able to see them. That is definetly wrong though! I can see if you use 10.x net for un-advertised touch-down nets between two routers, but you should definetly not be able to ping them from afar.
On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Marc Hurst wrote:
:Pinging ? [10.0.184.34] with 48 data bytes :Statistics for 10.0.184.34 :12 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 50% packet loss :round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 117/123/141 : :This is wrong.... : :I should not be able to do this! : :M. :
-- Regards,
Jason A. Lixfeld jlixfeld@idirect.ca System Administrator [L5] jlixfeld@torontointernetxchange.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TUCOWS Interactive Ltd. o/a | "A Different Kind of Internet Company" Internet Direct Canada Inc. | "FREE BANDWIDTH for Toronto Area IAPs" 5415 Dundas Street West | http://www.torontointernetxchange.net Suite 301, Toronto Ontario | (416) 236-5806 ext 18 (T) M9B-1B5 CANADA | (416) 236-5804 (F) ---------------------------------------------------------------------