On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:05:52PM -0200, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
Based on the results it seems to be easy to conclude that about the only reason to put IPv6 over [v4 over] MPLS on the networks (rather than directly on top of the physical infrastructure) is due to the other reason, because some vendors have sold crappy hardware which does not support IPv6, or does not offer sufficiently good IPv6 performance. Even hardware with good IPv6 performance seems to forward at half the rate of IPv4/MPLS packets;
we call that crappy hardware
Based on such point of view, non-crappy hardware would be: (blank) and crappy hardware would be (blank), could you fill the blanks ?
As with so many other situations, the blanks can be filled in with "Juniper" and "Cisco", in that order. http://www.juniper.net/company/presscenter/pr/2001/pr-011128.html -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)