In message <202705b1001241834l5b1911bat97ee2130f632f002@mail.gmail.com>, Jorge Amodio writes:
Good point, tomorrow/today we'll start seeing what gets broken and hopefully why.
Regards. Jorge
I don't expect to see much until the last root server (J) switches over. DNS implemententations are remarkably robust at routing around percieved "damage". Week of 2010-05-03: J starts to serve DURZ Mark
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> wrote:
Figured I'd drop a note here reminding folks of the signed root zone publication timeline, which calls for L root to begin serving a 'DURZ' the "week of 1/25/2010" -- which is now - depending on what timezone you're in:
<http://www.root-dnssec.org/2010/01/14/status-update-january-2010/>
If you've not evaluated the *systemic effects* of a signed root zone in your operating environment (prepped operations and helpdesk staff, your own resolvers, etc..) I'd strongly suggest you do so ASAP.
If you're not concerned because you're not signing anything - do note that 'systemic' is the operative word above, as this will impact you, whether you make any explicit changes in your environment or not.
G'luck,
-danny
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org