On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft <mmc@internode.com.au> wrote:
If the way of running this isn't out in the wild and it's actually dangerous then a pox on anyone who releases it, especially to gain publicity at the expensive of network operators sleep and well being. May you never find a reliable route ever again.
This needs fixing. It doesnt need publicity at security conferences till after cisco gets presented this stuff first and asked to release an emergency patch.
Agreed, You've got to remember though that a security conference is a commercial venture, it makes business sense for this to be publically announced at this security conference. I think security conferences have become something that sucks as its all become money making oriented and the people who run these things don't really have security in mind, just the £ signs reflecting on their eye balls.
--srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
All the best, n3td3v