In reply to your message of Tue, 02 Apr 1996 16:46:01 PST: | Even though I know how all this came about and how groups like NANOG | operate (what group!) I still don't believe it when people say that NANOG | doesn't set policy and NANOG is not affiliated with anybody. The fact is | that NANOG appears to set policy and NANOG appears to be affiliated with | somebody and that appearance is what counts until NANOG pipes up and | states what their official policy and official affiliations are. Machiavelli said it best: "For the great majority of mankind is concerned with appearances, as though they were realities, and prefers to deal with the things that seem, rather than those that are". The *fact* is that NANOG is not affiliated and does not set any policy. | Settlements are contrary to NANOG policy. It is also contrary to NANOG | policy to engage in long drawn out debates about things which have | already been decided, like "settlements are wrong". The policy is | unwritten and to a certain extent, non-verbal, but it is policy nevertheless. As a director of mine once said: "A policy is a written document that is binding in some fashion among one or more parties. If it's not in writing, it's a philosophy, not a policy." NANOG participants practice, to a greater or lesser extent, certain philosophies, and actualize certain mindsets, in their interactions and exchanges of information. This is not policy nor the setting of policy, even if NANOG members do set and implement policy in other venues. | BTW, the trick is to address it like this joe%farawayplace.com@majorhub.com And just to reciprocate on the distribution of clues, take the policy buck to InterNIC, the FCC, or the other regulatory body of your choice, not to NANOG. Also, from your other message: | You may not like the eyes of the world to be looking at you, but the fact | is that those eyes are going to be looking at you more and more as the | Internet grows in importance and people get curious at how it really works. Then the world will continue to be frustrated by a group of people whose interaction in this forum deals with technical realities rather than politically correct appearances. 'Nuff said. <donning the asbestos suit...> Rgrds, Paul ***definitely speaking solely for myself this time!*** Paul "Corwin" Frommeyer Work Internet Engineer, CCIE Play ISP Systems Engineer Network Sorcerer At Large Cisco Systems, Inc. Paul's Fone Company pfrommey@cisco.com corwin@palas.com *** Speaking solely for myself unless otherwise noted ***