On Feb 1, 2014, at 8:42 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
While the policy text does not spell out a list of technologies, I believe that the clear intent of the community from the discussions and from the examples given in the policy text was for minimal IPv4 allocations to support the transition process. While no ratio is given in the policy text, I doubt that a “we have 200 customers wanting to do 6RD” would be accepted as justification for a /24.
However, I am merely speculating here. I don’t have any direct answers from ARIN staff about how the policy would be interpreted. My statements are strictly my own personal interpretation of the community intent and an expression of my intent as the author of the policy.
Owen - To be clear, ARIN is inclined to approve requests whenever it is possible to do such in compliance with policy. Given the leeway in the present policy text, we're likely to approve any reasonable request which is made under this policy, and it would not be difficult to imagine requests for /24 being approved as a result. If pooled use/oversubscription or specific technologies are required, it would be very helpful to provide additional policy text to staff. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN