Might have been this one? Light, Camera, Actions: characterizing the usage of IXPs’ action BGP communities https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/4ed80bc4-c4... Cheers, Marinho.
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:00:50 -0300 From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas@gmail.com> To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> Cc: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>, nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild! Message-ID: <CAKEr4RQE+DrsGGLEK6eFOVMo4xaJhKGcvRvn9EzNRBrJ+Dw3RA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Em qui., 5 de set. de 2024 ?s 14:35, Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org> escreveu:
This may well be intentional
In addition to their own intention, they should ask if the other side agrees with that.
I don't remember which research paper compiled this. But the top 5 ASNs targeted by the no_export_to<asn> BGP communities at IXP Route-Servers say a lot about who mostly causes this type of problem.
-- Douglas Fernando Fischer Eng? de Controle e Automa??o