On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 02:17:08PM -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:05 PM Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> wrote:
This was also pitched as one of the killer-apps for the SpaceX Starlink satellite array, particularly for cross-Atlantic and cross-Pacific trading.
https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/marketintegrity/2019/06/25/fspacex-is-opening...
"Several commentators quickly caught onto the fact that an extremely expensive network whose main selling point is long-distance, low-latency coverage has a unique chance to fund its growth by addressing the needs of a wealthy market that has a high willingness to pay — high-frequency traders."
This is a nice plot for a movie, but not how HFT is really done. It's so much easier to colocate on the same datacenter of the exchange and run algorithms from there; while those algorithms need humans to guide their strategy, the human thought process takes a couple of seconds anyways. So the real HFTs keep using the defined strategy while the human controller doesn't tell it otherwise.
For faster access to one exchange, yes, absolutely, colocate at the exchange. But there's more then one exchange. As one example, many index futures trade in Chicago. The stocks that make up those indices mostly trade in New York. There's money to be made on the arbitrage, if your Chicago algorithms get faster information from New York (and vice versa) than everyone else's algorithms. More expensive but shorter fiber routes have been build between NYC and Chicago for this reason, as have a microwave paths (to get speed-of-light in air rather than in glass). There's competition to have the microwave towers as close as possible to the data centers, because the last mile is fiber so the longer your last mile, the less valuable your network. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-03-08/the-gazillion-dollar-stan... -- Brett