15 Jul
2014
15 Jul
'14
2:59 p.m.
At 12:18 PM 7/15/2014, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
If you are picky enough to prefer other radios that cost more on Mbps/$, that's your call,
We need reliability. That particular radio wouldn't cut it. As I've mentioned, users can get away with much less bandwidth if the quality is high, so going for a less reliable radio with a high nominal speed does not actually save money. Also, that 5 GHz radio is a "spectrum spammer" and hence is a bad neighbor. After 25 years of doing wireless, one learns what really works and what is a false economy. Believe me, we've learned some hard and expensive lessons. --Brett Glass