On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
That's not his block, its ours;
Sprint (NETBLK-SPRINTLINK-BLKB) SPRINTLINK-BLKB 204.94.0.0 - 204.97.255.0 Macro Computing (NETBLK-SPRINT-CC5F3F) SPRINT-CC5F3F 204.95.0.0 - 204.95.63.0
Addemdum: I've traded several emails with Ryan about this; it APPEARS that an upstream of ours was screwed up and announcing the specific /24 in question (we have no log of that ever having happened, nobody has touched the router configuration on our side, we have no customers who can inject a route without adding their own ASN to the path - which didn't happen - and further, only ONE of our upstreams was announcing the claimed more specific - and we send ALL internal routes to all BGP-speaking transit providers and peers, so if we were generating it the route should have shown up via multiple paths - which it appears did not happen.) We're still looking into this. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost