On 11/02/16 00:34, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I quoted a PCH peering paper at the Peering Track. (Not violating rules, talking about myself.)
The paper is: https://www.pch.net/resources/Papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011....
I said “99.97%” of all peering sessions have nothing behind them more than a “handshake” or an email. It seems I was in error. Mea Culpa.
The number in the paper, on page one is, 99.52%.
Hopefully everyone will read the paper, and perhaps help create better data.
Well, how about crowdsourcing some data? 3145 eBGP settlement-free peering-sessions (v4 and v6 combined) in US and EU. 350k routes recieved over SFI peering. 1 Written contract in EU for SFI 1 Written contract in US for SFI R&E Sector -- Apparently not a peering coordinator. Fredrik "hugge" Korsbäck AS2603