28 Mar
2009
28 Mar
'09
8:12 a.m.
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com writes:
or - the more modern approach is to let the node (w/ proper authorization) do a secure dynamic update of the revserse map - so the forward and reverse delegations match. ... a -VERY- useful technique.
I have a question. Is this an abuse problem? some ISPs require their domain to be in the rdns in an effort to herd abuse reports to the correct org. Is this generally considered useless? Is it generally considered OK to hand relatively untrusted users the keys to their own rdns? (I'm forcing my own customers to have a rdns of something.xen.prgmr.com for several months, Much to the chagrin of many presumably innocent and legitimate customers. )