On 9/19/22 20:58, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
Why not publish such a table?
It shouldn’t be a particularly difficult task and could prove rather enlightening.
Individual trial court cases aren't generally published. There may be a transcript at the local courthouse, but rarely available in any kind of online database. Appellate court decisions are more widely published as they are often cited as precedent in future cases. Even in those cases it may be difficult to find a freely available copy. While the decisions are public domain, they aren't widely distributed. Legal publishing houses find and "annotate" them making the annotated decision subject to copyright. These are then paywalled. ARIN could certainly, if they chose, produce a listing of the cases to which it was a party as well as those where ARIN counsel was called as an expert witness. Actual access to the text of such cases would be left as an exercise for the reader. -- Jay Hennigan - jay@west.net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV