-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote: | | Yes, this _is_ much worse. :-/ | | Thinking out loud here, but one's imagination runs | wild at the prospect of how much it will take before | more credence is given to a serious top-to-bottom security | infrastructure revamp. | | And holding these firms $responsible_ ... Not likely. This is totally off-the-cuff noise, but I find it much more credible that there was no "criminal" break in at Choicepoint. This is Choicepoint pre-explaining how certain records got into "unauthorsied" hands. Choicepoint/Seisint is a pretty controversial outfit, and pretty much always has been. Just google for big-boss Hank Asher This whole outfit smells to high heaven. How this is germane to nanog, I'm not too sure. my .01 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCEl8P0STXFHxUucwRAskiAJ913AgOuhCxojOJI8WeCCWfeGbF3ACeL6sU +r8xJ56qhmiamYUpcqXkkRs= =KCvy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----