15 Oct
2010
15 Oct
'10
7:35 p.m.
http://www.google.com/search?q=nanog+126+64 would be a good place to start... (And I'm guessing you mean that /64 is "awfully large", not /126) Scott. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com> wrote:
SO I have been turning up v6 with multiple providers now and notice that some choose /64 for numbering interfaces but one I came across use a /126. A /126 is awfully large (for interface numbering) and I am curious if there is some rationale behind using a /126 instead of a /64.
Zaid