I thought iced-over fiber was a little bit like muffler-bearings. Great excuse if they buy it. Mike On 4/1/11 6:07 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com> wrote:
It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss.
Owen
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote:
I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
----- Reply message ----- From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com> Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 9:01 am Subject: v6 Avian Carriers? To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;)
Scott
On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
Marc