2 Apr
2010
2 Apr
'10
2:02 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net> wrote:
Once upon a time, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> said:
All true, but I'd still say there's a special rung in hell for bad perl.
Ehh, bad perl is still more readable than good APL. At least I can reformat the perl! :-)
In my experience bad perl usually consists of using system() a lot to run shell commands and read the input. Creative well-written perl, now there's something unreadable and unmaintainable! :-) -B