5 Jun
2007
5 Jun
'07
9:39 a.m.
On 6/5/07, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> wrote:
Combined responses to save bandwidth and hassle (and number of times you have to press 'd'):
--
Just because it's behind NAT, does not mean it's unreahcable from the internet:
Okay, so exactly how many times do you think we have to say in this thread that by "NAT/PAT", we mean NAT/PAT as typically implemented in the very cheapest routers in their default configuration?
Even the cheapest routers have a 'DMZ' configuration option that adds a rule that, by default, sends all the traffic to a particular host. And using that is a fairly common solution to bypassing problems with port forwarding and NAT.