At 11:26 AM +0100 2005-07-04, Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com wrote:
I think that the marketing people are going to win this one. There is no marketable benefit to the ICANN root zone but there are clear advantages for countries using non-Latin alphabets to switch to a root zone that allows for their own language to be used in domain names.
That works, up until the point where India decides to use a different alternative root solution than China does. That works, up until the point where the inexperienced alternative root operators screw something up and their entire "expanded" Internet goes down, while the real root servers continue normal operations. The balkanization of the 'net is something to be avoided at all possible costs.
Turkey was recently mentioned and that is also a country that uses a non-Latin alphabet.
It doesn't matter how many non-Latin alphabets you introduce. What matters is that there can be only one root. -- Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.