25 Apr
2006
25 Apr
'06
12:39 a.m.
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:43:47 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?
If I was a Manhattan based company, and an event took out everything within 65 miles of there, whether my backups are OK is suddenly going to be the *least* of my concerns. (Hint - what percent of your employees commute *less* than 65 miles to work, and what disaster-recovery plans do you have for *them*?)