Kevin Oberman wrote:
That said, the actual, published document has some huge issues. It pays excellent lip service to net neutrality, but it has simply HUGE loopholes with lots of weasel words that could be used to get away with most anything. for example, it expressly excludes and wireless network.
Not having read any of the articles and not having researched the matter of network neutrality much at all. But wouldn't using either a VPN service or setting up VPN on one or more virtual servers at strategic locations of your choice avoid this? Unless "they" try to bandwidth limit your VPN tunnel(s) indiscriminately. Or did I miss something blatantly obvious? At least VPN does a great job of "routing around" GeoIP blocking... Greetings, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html