21 Sep
2003
21 Sep
'03
9:51 p.m.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:01:27PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
The problem is many "clients" act as servers for part of the transaction. [...] And do we really want to discuss peer-to-peer networking, which as the name suggests, peer-to-peer.
The Internet has always consisted of peer-to-peer hosts. It seems odd that people talk about peer-to-peer as a new feature. ...and are there similarities with those basic assumptions and those people expected from the .com/.net domains? For either case, have you (the collective recipients of this email) thought both long and hard about those two issues. Are your beliefs about each compatible? John