Francois Menard wrote:
The Coalition of Internet Service Providers has filed a substantial contribution at the CRTC stating:
1) The CRTC should forbid DPI, as it cannot be proven to be 98.5% effective at trapping P2P, such as to guarantee congestion relief
2) The CRTC should allow for other forms of traffic management by ISPs, such as Flow Management
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/2008/8646/c12_200815400/1029835.zip
This is part of the public record at the following address:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/8646/c12_200815400.htm
The world will see Canada taking head-on the issue of addressing the legitimacy of DEEP PACKET INSPECTION as a mean of properly managing an incumbent's network behind the unbundling/peering interface.
NANOG cannot pretend that this debate does not take place and remain silent on this.
Francios; Are you responding directly to my post via an automated filter, or am I the only one seeing the hijacking of this thread? Either way, great! I thought that I'd state that I forgot to mention in my original post that I was considering running HSRP (vrrp) on my core routers, for the access-layer clients who are not multi-homed. Given my setup, does RFC3768 at the 'core' make sense? Steve