-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 8/14/2011 8:36 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
Can someone explain the operational relevance of the never ending v6 threads that are the EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS over and over and over again? :)
Yes, they prove that IPv6 is not a viable technology as it currently stands and we should be working on the next big thing, of course! IPv42, here I come! On a serious note, though, really, what DOES it say about the real-world maturity / actual chances of adoption for IPv6 that Charles' statement above is, in fact, true? Not trying to be anti-IPv6 or start a flamewar (well, okay, I am trying to start a flamewar, that's what Sunday nights are for :)), it's honestly something that puzzles me. It just doesn't feel right... Regards, Tim - -- Tim Wilde, Senior Software Engineer, Team Cymru, Inc. twilde@cymru.com | +1-630-230-5433 | http://www.team-cymru.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAk5Ia8AACgkQluRbRini9thKyACfZ6H6m0GQRLm6SWCOGZ663j/G 5+kAn0JM74VwRkCeaBhaTRYEY3Hz7oK1 =h5jP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----