Yo Töma! On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 04:16:49 +0200 Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> wrote:
(I'm making up figures now, obviously)
When you base decision on imaginary figures, you get suboptimal results.
the SNR of UGC in IPv4 is like 10x times it is in IPv6
My experience, using fail2band, and spamassassin, for over a decade with IPv6, is that 100x more spam and other abuse comes from IPv4, not IPv6.
your management would start asking questions about whether it's really the best time to invest in this rather than in another potential revenue stream.
Now what would your management thinK? Then toss in that IPv6 is faster than IPv4. Dunno why, but easy to prove that for yourself. If you care to experiment, rather than make up figures. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin