Something Jon Devree and I were thinking about: How would they handle cookies the size of 1 MB or larger? Scary as it sounds, looks like a simple DOS attack waiting to happen :\ JOhn Menerick On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Jake Matthews <jmatthews@cia.com> wrote:
Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:31:57PM -0400, Jake Matthews wrote:
Apparently Charter is going to packetsniff its users and use that for commercial purposes.
I think you'd find they'd run pretty far afoul of 18 USC 2511 for that, without prior consent (18 USC 2511 2) (c)).
I looked at that page, and as far as I can tell, they are just referring to web ads, likely placed on their consumer portal site.
Where do you get the notion that they are intercepting traffic? Everything I see refers to a third party ad network, with no subscriber data provided by charter. i.e. a typical advertisers tracking cookie.
Using another cookie to opt out of the first cookie isn't unusual, since it's the same mechanism that would be involved in the first place.
In any case, trying to correlate captured traffic to a cookie that would only be exposed in web traffic and to the site that set it, would not be reliably possible.
--msa
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20461817-HSI-Charter-to-monitor-surfing-ins...
Apparently, not just their portal.
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog