William Pitcock wrote:
Cernal and Atrivo are two different entities, Atrivo used to host Cernal, but now they have different hosting arrangements.
I now understand the original point you were trying to make about Atrivo. I disagree with your premise that it is actually a different entity than Cernel, but am not trying to debate that on this list for various reasons. Acting under my (incorrect or correct) assumption that they are in fact the same entity, I made my post to show that "the boys were back". That is, for a decent amount of time, parts of 85.255.112.0/20 were not being advertised, and hence the dns hijacking pointing selected http traffic to 67.210.0.0/20 wasn't happening. My point was that it (fairly) recently started being advertised again, and it was the same old song and dance wrt dns/http hijacking/fraud. Regards, Alex Lanstein FireEye, Inc. ________________________________________ From: William Pitcock [nenolod@systeminplace.net] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 3:35 PM To: Alex Lanstein Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list? On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 09:55 -0800, Alex Lanstein wrote:
Also, the fact that Atrivo is *dead* and this stuff is still listed means that anyone who gets those blocks from ARIN next are basically screwed
Why would you say Atrivo is dead?
root@localhost --- {~} nslookup www.googleadservices.com 85.255.114.83 Server: 85.255.114.83 Address: 85.255.114.83#53
Name: www.googleadservices.com Address: 67.210.14.113
That is Cernal, and it is hosted in Russia now. Cernal and Atrivo are two different entities, Atrivo used to host Cernal, but now they have different hosting arrangements. Can people get a clue and understand this very critical difference? Thanks. William -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.