27 Sep
2015
27 Sep
'15
11:20 p.m.
On 27 September 2015 at 18:38, Lyle Giese <lyle@lcrcomputer.net> wrote:
Part of freedom is to minimize the harm and I think that is where the parties replying to this thread diverge. A broken change that causes harm should have/could have been tested better before releasing it to the public on the Internet.
Or if a bad release is let loose on the Internet, how does Google minimize the harm?
How would this be any different by google introducing TCP related issue in their frontend servers? This is not a protocol issue, this is QA issue that could impact arbitrary technology. I'd like to say I've not broken stuff by misunderstanding impact of my changes, but unfortunately I can't. -- ++ytti