They're already trying - RFC 6598. On the flip side, I'm using subnets from that range for my home network instead of RFC 1918 space right now. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -ITG (ITechGeek) ITG@ITechGeek.Com https://itg.nu/ GPG Keys: https://itg.nu/contact/gpg-key Preferred GPG Key: Fingerprint: AB46B7E363DA7E04ABFA57852AA9910A DCB1191A Google Voice: +1-703-493-0128 / Twitter: ITechGeek / Facebook: http://fb.me/Jbwa.Net On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com> wrote:
Let's just hope carriers don't try to fix IPv4 instead of going to IPv6. I'd like my children to grow up in a worlds without cgnat.
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Satchell Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 1:38 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: ARIN Region IPv4 Free Pool Reaches Zero
On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, Dovid Bender wrote:
The issue now is convincing clients that they need it. The other issue is many software vendors still don't support it.
And this may trigger a refresh on routers, as people old or refurbed equipment find they need to change. The whole reason for the inertia against going to IPv6 is "it ain't broke, so I not gonna 'fix' it."
Now it's broke.