Subject: Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Date: Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:27:46AM -0700 Quoting Merike Kaeo (merike@doubleshotsecurity.com):
B: they *did* know about the issue, but convincing management to spend the cash to buy hardware that doesn't suck was hard, because "everything is working fine at the moment" -- some folk needed things to fail spectacularity to be able to justify shelling out the $$$ ( yes, they could recard the TCAM, but they are using this as an excuse to get some real gear)…
Oh yeah, I'd bet this is also the case. Just like in 'security' related issues….
This is why "test crash" was introduced. http://markmail.org/message/tu46ecy272o3stvp /Måns, just rebooted. (with a new carving already configured) -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 Thousands of days of civilians ... have produced a ... feeling for the aesthetic modules --