Geo, OK Time for me to get coffee.... I missed the "not stop". it might not stop a packet if the route-map isn't applied to the interface..... Pablo On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 12:58, Paul A. Bradford wrote:
Geo, Not sure if I want to answer. is this OT for NANOG? :)
the key is:
IP: Total Length = 92 (0x5C)
normal ICMP packets are not 92 bytes in length.... our friend Nachi does use 92 byte packets.
BTW: good luck trying the route-map on 2948G-L3s... ;)
Thanks, Paul
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 12:55, Jack Bates wrote:
Scott McGrath wrote:
Geo,
Look at your set interface Null0 command the rest is correct you want to set the next hop to be Null0. How to do this is left as an exercise for the reader.
Interface Null0 works fine. Here's a quick check.
Inbound (from peers) policy matches route-map nachi-worm, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): 199 length 92 92 Set clauses: interface Null0 Policy routing matches: 10921 packets, 1048416 bytes
Outbound (to internal network) accesslist matches Extended IP access list 181 deny tcp any any eq 135 (1994 matches) permit icmp any any echo (757 matches) permit icmp any any echo-reply (381 matches) permit ip any any (381370 matches)
I cleared 181 first, then cleared route-map counters. I then checked route-map counters first before checking access-list counters. This means the access-list has more time to accrue maches yet it is considerably smaller. The checks were a matter of seconds. I'd say the policy is working. The echo/echo-reply could easily be everyday pings which are up abit due to various networks having performance issues.
IOS Versioning can sometimes have issues. There's also the question of if the packet came in the inbound interface that had the policy applied.
-Jack -- Paul A Bradford Senior Network Engineer Adelphia Cable Communications 814-274-1353