On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com> wrote:
If you want to go on a wild goose chase, start chasing down 240/4 and you might make some progress.
As i have mentioned before, it was only after i gave up on 240/4 for private network numbering that i really earnestly took on IPv6-only as a strategy. Seeing 240/4 actually work would be nice, but i have already concluded it does not fit my exhaustion timeline given how many edge devices will never support it.
If i have to fork lift, it should be for ipv6.
240/4 has been enabled in Linux since 2.6.25 (applied on January 21, 2008 by David Miller) so that's like three years already.
Yep, and that's great. Let me know when a Cisco 7600 will route a packet like this. Cameron