On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 12:02:09PM -0500, Brett Frankenberger wrote: [snip]
RFC2821 would be a good place to go to justify decisions on same. (Well, to justify a decision to implement postmaster@any.domain.for.which.mail.is.accepted, and to implement "postmaster". It wouldn't really help you justify a decision to not implement that. OTOH, if someone is arguing that the the mere existance of xyz.com implies that postmaster@xyz.com must exist, then I would note that neither RFC2821 nor any other RFC of which I am aware imposes such a requirement. As long as @xyz.com isn't being used for any mail, there is no requirement for postmaster@xyz.com to exist.)
Some country-TLD registrars do have this requirement, however. Greetz, Peter -- Monopoly http://www.dataloss.nl/monopoly.html