16 Oct
2003
16 Oct
'03
11:53 a.m.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:16:53 CDT, Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> said:
I would certainly say there's an elitism, or perhaps a higher level of credibility given to a .com or .net site, due to the fact that they've probably existed for quite a bit longer than a .biz or .info.
Most of my spam points back to .com addresses. Not much credibility generated there... There's sufficient churn on the bottom-feeding .com's that it's not a reliable indicator. Now you want *stability*, look for a site that's got a .arpa other than in-addr.arpa :)