Rob,

It is all fine.

I did not want to say anything to enter part of a bunch of critique, sorry.

I value the pointer to document.

Being on VPN means to some times get useful info that others dont have, and other times it means to be denied useful info that others have.  But VPN is mandatory policy in some places.  It has nothing to do with Nanog policy, if there is one.  There might be a need to link together the VPN world with the non-VPN world.

Nanog is a great place where people keep the Internet running by collaboration, including AS numbers.

Yours,

Alex, LF/HF 2

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 21:20, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

1. I did not understand why you call it "_Google_ and... Handbook"

For goodness sake I posted here looking for an AS15169 contact for a useful project that needs some of their help.

What I seem to be getting is a bunch of critique from folks who don't understand the difference between the Internet and a corporate VPN which is MITMing their SSL traffic about the merits of the technology choices the project made and the country it originates in (in case you haven't noticed all of our governments are all screwing this up).

Nanog has gone to the dogs, it wasn't like this after 9/11!

Thanks folks.