On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
On 19/04/2010 16:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm pretty sure the acceptance of NAT varies regionally. I think there's a large ISP in Italy which has been doing NAT since the 90s.
to my knowledge, if we're talking about the same organisation, this large ISP is moving away from NAT, or already has done so.
Sure, you can NAT eyeballs, but it hurts like hell.
Which hurts more ... NATting eyeballs, or blinding them entirely?
Eventually we'll run out. Then we get to pick.
IPv6 is not blinding them entirely.
No, IPv6 is clear vision. My _point_ was that NAT'ing eyeballs was better than providing no IPv4 gameplan (i.e. blind). ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.