Isn't it interesting how that coincides with pay per bit (for the most part) pricing. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 -------------------------------- http://twitter.com/kscotthelms -------------------------------- On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 22, 2014 7:04 AM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
Verizon wireless has other transits apart from 701.
That's interesting that they have a different capacity management strategy for the competitive wireless market than they have for their captive landline customers.
Seems market forces are making wireless a functional network without the peering brinksmanship while market failings are allowing landline to take advantage of a captive install base
Sent via telepathy
On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Question: does verizon wireless have a different capacity / peering practice from verizon broadband ? Or do verizon wireless customers also suffer the same performance issue?