In message <20150827065346.58554fa7@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>, Tore Anderson writes:
Hi Mark,
* Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
In our deployment, we do not offer customers private IPv4 addresses. I suppose we can afford to do this because a) we still have lots of public IPv4, b) we are not a mobile carrier. So any of our customers with IPv4 will never hit the NAT64 gateway.
When we do run out of public IPv4 addresses (and cannot get anymore from AFRINIC), all new customers will be assigned IPv6 addresses.
Why wait until then?
Any particular reason why you cannot already today provide IPv6 addresses to your [new] customers in parallel with IPv4?
Tore
Or why you are looking at NAT64 instead of DS-Lite, MAP-E, or MAP-T all of which are better solutions than NAT64. NAT64 + DNS64 which breaks DNSSEC. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org