On 17 Jan 2019, at 09:07, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
On 16/Jan/19 19:49, John Von Essen wrote:
Im confused as to what exactly happened and how it was implemented. I assume the government wanted to restrict access to sites like whatsapp, facebook, twitter, etc.,. So did they tell national ISPs/Mobile (strong-arm) to simply block access to those sites, or they did they tell them to completely shutdown and go dark until the protests were over. Im just curious as to how an ISP/Mobile would selectively block access under government influence, reason being... understanding how can help us think of ways to get around it.
For example, lets say the mobile networks null routed all traffic destined to twitter and facebook networks... not a complete IP shutdown. So a local citizen is using email from a local provider (non-gmail, etc.,.) and still has access to email, Twitter knows they are blocked in ZW, but they still try to email updates to this example citizen. If their networks are being null routed, they can simply deliver the email via an alternate network/platform.
The whole thing is very disturbing, I mean this is 2019 right? Not 1984...
It's not unusual for networks to be shutdown, particularly during riots and/or elections. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, I'm just saying it's not unusual.
This happened during the recent elections in Uganda and Kenya, for example.
Typically, the operating licenses issued by the gubbermints to operators provide for legal avenues by the gubbermint to shutdown services. It is not the gubbermint's responsibility as to how this is implemented by the operators, just that it be done.
Would a service be viewed as the same as (layer2 connectivity to a out of country layer3/layer4 endpoint). ie ip source out of country but connectivity layer in country ? satcomms in effect but terrestrial based pvc with leaf router out of country. Colin
In recent years, social media resources have been targets, so Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter et al. However, if the gubbermint takes a broader approach, it's up to the operator to figure out how to do it. Failure to comply can result in arrests, fines, jail or even revocation of the license.
All mobile operators have terribly advanced DPI infrastructure, so it's not difficult to shut services down at a very granular level.
Operators that deliver services via terrestrial means also employ DPI infrastructure, because selling bandwidth access by the Gig-loads is big business :-\. So they, too, can implement shutdowns with a reasonable degree of granularity.
Mark.