2 Sep
2015
2 Sep
'15
10:11 a.m.
On 2 Sep 2015, at 16:48, Mark Tinka wrote:
Those VLAN's and VRF's are following the same path as the global table, just in a different routing table. That is easy, and we do that already.
Sure. But it's better than mixing it in with customer traffic.
Your assertion, before, was that the OoB network is physically separate from the routers it is supporting. This is less feasible at scale.
Ideally, it should be - that's what I was trying to get across. I understand that this isn't free, either from a capex or opex perspective. ----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>