9 Jul
2004
9 Jul
'04
5:10 p.m.
For anyone who cares:
I'm a mammal who cares. I only just read the findings, it does go on for 85 pages. At the Registrars Constituency meeting held at the Rome ICANN meeting I spoke unkindly to the smiling-everything-is-fine dream team of Cerf and Twomey, that they took far too long to issue a cease-and-desist to VGRS for SiteFinder. That got an EAGAIN (you are wrong, we're fast enough) from Cerf, and an ENOCLUE from Twomey. For the original, look to: http://www.icann.org/committees/security/ssac-report-09jul04.pdf See also http://www.icann.org/legal/verisign-v-icann-motion-dismiss-06jul04.pdf One of VGRS's causes of action was that ICANN shouldn't have interfered with SiteFinder. Eric