Around the 2004 timeframe the RBOCs were having a discussion with the FCC, basically saying that if the FCC did not apply unbundling to their fiber builds they would build fiber, and that if the FCC did apply unbundling rules they would not. The FCC wanted fiber deployed, so they withheld applying unbundling rules. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Jimmy Hess [mailto:mysidia@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:47 PM To: John T. Yocum Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Verizon, FiOS, and CLEC/UNE orders (was AT&T diversity) On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, John T. Yocum <john.yocum@fluidhosting.com> wrote:
VZ wants to get rid of their copper plant. It's expensive to maintain, and
As opposed to fiber plant which is indestructible and cheap to maintain? Well, if VZ owns the copper, if it's not being used to provide a service, and the price of copper keeps going up, it's only a matter of time before VZ should want to take their bits of unused cable back. How useful is leaving a dormant loop in place just because someone might theoretically want it someday? Seems like a waste for VZ not to reclaim it so it can be recycled/put to good use.
it requires that they sell service to competitors. Once they've disconnected their customers from it, they can just eliminate the copper plant. POTS
You sure the regulations won't eventually be updated to apply some rules to whatever POTS is being replaced with? Possibly years before they could finish eliminating their copper plant, which doesn't likely happen until the pricing allows POTS customers to get FiOS delivery installed for free as a cheaper alternative to POTS delivery. -- -JH