I’d be interested to understand the rationale for not wanting to change the definition. Is it strictly the business/capital outlay expense?

Thanks,

Chris Adams

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+chris.adams=ung.edu@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Jason Canady
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 8:39 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the University of North Georgia. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you suspect this message is fraudulent, please forward to spam@ung.edu or contact the IT Service Desk at 706-864-1922.

I second Mike.

On 5/28/21 8:37 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

I don't think it needs to change.

-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com

---

From: "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 7:29:08 PM
Subject: New minimum speed for US broadband connections


What should be the new minimum speed for "broadband" in the U.S.?


This is the list of past minimum broadband speed definitions by year

year  speed

1999  200 kbps in both directions (this was chosen as faster than
dialup/ISDN speeds)

2000  200 kbps in at least one direction (changed because too many service
providers had 128 kbps upload)

2010   4 mbps down / 1 mbps up

2015   25 Mbps down / 3 Mbps up (wired)
         5 Mbps down / 1 Mbps up (wireless)

2021   ??? / ??? (some Senators propose 100/100 mbps)

Not only in major cities, but also rural areas

Note, the official broadband definition only means service providers can't
advertise it as "broadband" or qualify for subsidies; not that they must
deliver better service.